These FAQ were developed to complement GAVA’s resources on vitamin A supplementation (VAS) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including GAVA’s consensus statement and operational guide. The FAQ are organized by topic:
Vitamin A is essential to support growth and help combat infections in childhood. Clinical trials have demonstrated that VAS is a life-saving intervention that is vital to reduce the risk of child mortality, morbidity, and malnutrition in countries with high levels of vitamin A deficiency (VAD). Although there is currently no evidence on the effectiveness of high-dose VAS for the treatment of COVID-19 or the reduction in severity of the specific illness it causes, VAS is especially important for vulnerable children during an infectious disease outbreak when access to health services is limited.
Yes, they do. The administration of the oral polio vaccine is similar to that of VAS, so many of the same risks for COVID-19 transmission during service delivery exist for both services. However, the benefits of conducting a polio campaign will be different than the benefits of conducting a VAS campaign, so a separate risk benefit analysis should be completed for VAS.
The first step in planning VAS delivery through routine health services is to map all potential platforms where children aged 6-11 months and children aged 12-59 months can be reached. The following steps and criteria will help complete this task:
Restrictions on large gatherings have forced countries to make a rapid shift to routine delivery of VAS to ensure the continuity of VAS during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, countries should not accelerate a permanent policy shift towards routine delivery.
This temporary shift to routine VAS delivery during the pandemic may highlight some best practices and lessons learned, but a permanent policy shift to routine requires a comprehensive, systems approach and a well-articulated plan that is ideally implemented in a stepwise manner, where countries roll out the transition gradually across districts/states/provinces. It should not be rushed or implemented during a pandemic when the health system is not functioning as usual.
Household-level distribution of VAS can be executed safely in the context of COVID-19 by respecting key infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. When possible, VAS should be administered outside the dwelling or in a well-ventilated area, and health workers should maintain physical distancing by remaining 1-2m away from caregivers, children, and other family members. Sections 3.2 and 4.1 of the GAVA guide detail the IPC measures required to safely distribute VAS at the household level.
If household-level distribution is prohibited, VAS can be delivered at fixed sites such as health posts, health centres, health system outreach sites, or other places within the community. Guidance on how to carry out the delivery of VAS at fixed sites can be found in Section 4.2 of the GAVA guide.
In densely populated areas where physical distancing is difficult to maintain, it is crucial that health workers are provided with the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for distributing VAS (i.e. medical masks). Program managers should also consider ways to reduce the risk of crowding during distribution. This might include reducing the number of people expected to attend each distribution event, integrating VAS delivery with other health services, or increasing the number of days and distribution sites for VAS delivery. Additional recommendations on how to reduce the risk of crowding can be found in Section 4.2.1 of the GAVA guide.
The choice between the health worker or caregiver administration model is based on the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) for health workers. GAVA recommends that VAS be administered by trained health workers wearing medical masks, incorporating additional steps into the usual VAS administration protocol as described in the GAVA guide. However, where medical masks are not available in sufficient quantities, health workers should maintain 1-2m distance from caregivers and children. In this scenario, the caregiver administration model must be employed to allow the health worker to maintain physical distancing from the child and caregiver.
The caregiver administration model is a mitigation strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic in settings where personal protective equipment (PPE) is not available for health workers.
Typically, GAVA recommends health worker administration because health workers are well trained to handle the challenges associated with VAS administration (e.g. handling the small capsule and cutting the tip off of the capsule, ensuring that each child receives the correct dose). However, during VAS administration the health worker must get close enough to the child and caregiver to squeeze the contents of the capsule into the child’s mouth. In the COVID-19 context, this close contact could put the health worker, caregiver, and child at risk of COVID-19 transmission as physical distancing cannot be maintained. For this reason, health workers should wear a medical mask while administering VAS.
The caregiver administration model is recommended in contexts where medical masks are not available for use by health workers, as it allows the health worker to maintain physical distancing, so VAS distribution continues in the absence of PPE. When weighing the benefit of the child receiving their VAS versus the challenges involved in the caregiver administering the VAS, it is better that the child receives their age-appropriate dose of VAS using the caregiver administration model.
Yes, it will likely be necessary to add additional days for VAS distribution during COVID-19 to be able to reach the same coverage levels as before the pandemic. The additional IPC steps incorporated into the VAS administration protocol might mean that each administration will take more time, so with the goal of reaching the same number of children, this will likely require additional days (or, alternatively, additional health workers). This applies to VAS distribution through mass campaigns or routine delivery, whether VAS is distributed at the household level or at fixed sites.
For VAS distribution at fixed sites, the addition of extra days for VAS distribution can also help to reduce the risk of crowding and reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission between families attending the event. Section 4.2.1 of the GAVA guide provides some suggestions on how to plan for fixed site VAS distribution to reduce the risk of crowding.
Good communication is an important part of planning for the delivery of VAS and other essential health and nutrition services. In addition to informing caregivers of the benefits of VAS for young children, a well-designed communication strategy can help community members feel at ease seeking health and nutrition services, by providing up-to-date, accurate information on where and when VAS is available, basic preventive measures put in place to prevent infection and how VAS is being delivered safely to children. Information should be disseminated through trusted information sources, using multiple communication approaches. Section 2.2 of the GAVA guide provides additional details on the recommended actions to be taken to communicate and engage with communities in the context of COVID-19.
In the caregiver administration model, the VAS administration is managed by the health worker (i.e. she or he instructs and supervises), but the steps are carried out by the caregiver. This model is a significant deviation to many countries’ VAS policies. After deciding to proceed with the caregiver administration model, there may be the need to revise national and subnational VAS policies to allow for capsule administration by caregivers. The VAS program communication strategy should be revised to include messages informing caregivers of the change and emphasizing that caregivers will be supported by health workers during the process. Training materials and protocols will also need to be updated to reflect this change in policy. Given the challenges associated with engaging caregivers to administer the capsule, GAVA recommends training health workers on how to carefully instruct the caregiver to carry out the administration, and to provide close supervision and guidance.
The GAVA guide provides some images and step-by-step instructions to support the proper administration of VAS by caregivers, but additional communication materials will be required to conduct community engagement and disseminate information to communities.
GAVA’s operational guidance is focused on the process of administering vitamin A capsules, but this does not mean that VAS must be delivered on its own. We recommend that VAS be co-delivered with other services. While our guide does not cover the logistics of handling the deworming tablet or conducting nutrition screening, many of the same infection prevention and control (IPC) measures apply when carrying out those activities.
Yes. There is no safety risk in giving high-dose VAS to young children on the same day/at the same time as iron syrup or vitamin A-containing MNP.
Yes, VAS can still be distributed in areas where there is limited access to COVID-19 testing. The GAVA guide recommends that screening be conducted prior to VAS administration, allowing for additional infection prevention and control (IPC) measures to be put in place to protect health workers from infection. Furthermore, the IPC measures described in the GAVA guide are meant to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission between health workers and community members and within communities, understanding that screening may not be sensitive enough to detect all cases.
The screening advised in the GAVA guide does not require the use of COVID-19 tests; rather, it considers the common symptoms and risk factors for COVID-19 infection. This advice is to ensure that health workers who are suspected or presumed cases of COVID-19 are not involved in the distribution of VAS until they no longer meet the criteria of a suspected or presumed case.
There are no sicknesses or illnesses that prevent a child from receiving their age-appropriate dose of VAS. All children aged 6-59 months should be given twice-yearly VAS, even if they are suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. If a child is a suspected or confirmed case, appropriate measures should be taken to protect health workers during VAS administration; these measures are outlined in section 3.2.1 of the GAVA guide. Children are exposed to morbidity and mortality risks related to other health problems including measles that may re-emerge due to decreased vaccination coverage resulting from the impact of COVID-19 on essential health services. Although there is no evidence that VAS decreases or increases morbidity or mortality due to COVID-19, VAS is especially important during the pandemic to protect children from preventable morbidity and mortality in settings where vitamin A deficiency is a public health problem.
Screening for COVID-19 typically involves looking for symptoms such as fever, cough or shortness of breath, as well as a history of travel to a location with known COVID-19 transmission or contact with a confirmed or probable case . Screening should be conducted in accordance with local policy on COVID-19 surveillance. For more guidance on screening, up-to-date case definitions are available from WHO .
Ideally health workers have access to necessary tools such as digital thermometers to conduct screening for COVID-19, but this has financial implications and may not be feasible in all contexts. As such, it is recommended that as a minimum, screening be based on symptoms rather than the actual measurement of body temperature.
Health workers should always follow national and local guidelines on appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Guidance from WHO and UNICEF describes the appropriate infection prevention and control (IPC) precautions—including PPE such as medical masks, gowns and gloves—required for different health care activities. While the guidance does not specifically mention VAS, it explains that health workers are not required to wear medical gloves and gowns when conducting activities similar to VAS administration . For this reason, GAVA did not include a recommendation for the use of medical gowns or gloves by health workers administering VAS. In accordance with global guidance, the GAVA guide emphasizes the importance of frequent hand hygiene for health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic as a critical IPC measure to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Section 3.1 of the GAVA guide details the critical times for hand hygiene during VAS administration.
In accordance with WHO guidance on the rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) , the GAVA guide recommends that health workers wear medical masks during VAS administration. Although cloth masks may be appropriate for use by healthy members of the general public, the use of cloth masks as an alternative to medical masks is not considered appropriate for the protection of health workers , whether distribution occurs at the community level or at higher administrative levels.
The GAVA guide does not make specific recommendations on the use of masks by caregivers. Caregivers and other community members should follow local policies regarding the use of masks by the general public.
No. The health worker must not cut open the capsule in the caregiver administration model because the health worker and the caregiver would come in close contact when the open capsule is transferred to the caregiver by hand. This would defeat the requirement for physical distancing that the caregiver administration model is being implemented to address.
Although the opening of the capsule might be a new skill for the caregiver to learn, wastage of capsule contents can be minimized by providing the caregiver with clear guidance and close supervision. The health worker should provide step-by-step guidance to the caregiver during the entire VAS administration, including providing instruction on how to cut open the capsule without applying too much pressure to the capsule. If there is wastage of the capsule contents, the caregiver should discard the open capsule and the health worker should give them a new capsule to repeat the steps. The increased risk of capsule loss when using the caregiver administration method is a consideration to keep in mind during the planning stages.
A tray or container is required for the health worker to pass the vitamin A capsule to the caregiver while maintaining physical distancing, so that they don’t have to pass it by hand through close contact. Many objects can be used to serve this purpose. The object should be dry and clean and must have raised edges to prevent the capsule from falling off. It should be made from a material that can be cleaned easily such as plastic or metal. Although the terms “tray” and “container” are used throughout the GAVA guide, the instrument can be any shape, such as a plate, saucer, or cup.
During caregiver administration, a third space is required to facilitate the transfer of tools and materials between the health worker and caregiver, without requiring them to exchange the items directly through close contact, so that physical distancing can be maintained. For example, at the beginning of the process, the caregiver approaches the third space, leaves the child health card for the health worker, and returns to a 1-2m distance. The health worker can then approach the table to pick up the card, while maintaining physical distancing protocol with the caregiver or child.
To support the safe and effective administration of VAS by caregivers, the health worker must give the caregiver detailed guidance on the necessary steps. The health worker should watch the caregiver carefully throughout the VAS administration and observe the process closely while maintaining physical distancing.
In the case of infants and very young children, caregivers should ask for help from another household member if possible as it may be challenging for them to complete all the steps required for VAS administration on their own.
Large gatherings are prohibited or discouraged to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission within communities, so many countries are considering distributing VAS at the household level or through community-level distribution events. However, in most settings there are not enough trained health professionals available to distribute VAS to all children in their catchment area through community-level delivery methods. So, many governments are considering having community health workers/volunteers (CHW/V) distribute VAS during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In some countries, CHW/V already play a major role in VAS distribution. In some settings they assist with logistics and support health workers during VAS distribution events; in this role, they can be helpful to manage patient flow, provide information to caregivers and children, and help with crowd control. In other settings, CHW/V are responsible for administering the vitamin A capsules themselves. The administration of VAS is a relatively simple task that does not require a health diploma, so it is possible for CHW/V to administer VAS as long as they are trained.
The decision to shift the responsibility of VAS administration to community health workers/volunteers (CHW/V) is very context specific. Careful consideration should be taken before deciding on task-shifting of VAS admin to CHW/V, to ensure that they are well trained, well equipped and well supported.
To limit movement between communities and where movement restrictions are in place, alternative methods must be employed to provide supportive supervision to health facilities and health workers. Subnational health management teams should consider conducting remote supervision over the phone or with mobile platforms and should only carry out field visits when necessary. Countries will need to assess mobile phone connectivity and set up agreements and partnerships with mobile network providers to ensure that some cost efficiencies can be achieved while increasing mobile phone coverage to remote communities. If the local COVID-19 response strategies do not impede movement and it’s possible to follow the necessary infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, in-person supervision can be considered in contexts where communication over the phone is not possible or if one-on-one supervision is necessary.
While there is no specific guidance available on supportive supervision of VAS programs in the context of COVID-19, GAVA is collecting examples of best practices of effective methods. In the meantime, guidance on supportive supervision is available in various COVID-19-related documents developed by WHO and other partners [6, 3, 7, 8].
In the context of COVID-19, GAVA does not recommend using the same spoon to deliver vitamin A syrup to more than one child. Following WHO guidance, equipment such as spoons should be single-use and disposable, or if one spoon is to be used for more than one child, it must be cleaned and disinfected between children (e.g. by using ethyl alcohol 70%) .
It is impossible for health workers to administer vitamin A syrup while following physical distancing rules. Therefore, health workers should always wear medical masks when using vitamin A syrup to administer VAS. Unlike the capsule delivery method, syrup cannot be administered by caregivers, because even if the caregiver pours the syrup into their child’s mouth, the health worker still needs to approach the caregiver to pour the syrup into the caregiver’s spoon.
Click here to download a PDF version of the FAQ.
|||GAVA, “Administration of vitamin A supplementation for preschool-aged children in the context of COVID-19,” GAVA, 18 June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.gava.org/content/user_files/2020/06/GAVA-Operational-Guidance-VAS-in-the-context-of-COVID-19-1.pdf. [Accessed 18 June 2020].|
|||GAVA, “Universal vitamin A supplementation for preschool-aged children in the context of COVID-19: GAVA consensus statement,” GAVA, 22 June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.gava.org/content/user_files/2020/04/GAVA-Consensus-Statement-VAS-in-the-context-of-COVID-19-v.20200407.pdf. [Accessed 22 June 2020].|
|||WHO/UNICEF, “Community-based health care, including outreach and campaigns, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic,” 5 May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Comm_health_care-2020.1. [Accessed 1 August 2020].|
|||WHO, “Global Surveillance for human infection with coronavirus disease (COVID-19),” WHO, March 20 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-surveillance-for-human-infection-with-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov). [Accessed 8 August 2020].|
|||WHO, “Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages,” 6 April 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/rational-use-of-personal-protective-equipment-for-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-and-considerations-during-severe-shortages. [Accessed 30 April 2020].|
|||WHO, “Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected,” 19 March 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-331495. [Accessed 16 August 2020].|
|||WHO, “Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context,” 1 June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-332240. [Accessed 1 August 2020].|
|||IFRC, “Supportive supervision during COVID-19,” May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pscentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Supportive-supervision-during-COVID-19.pdf. [Accessed 1 August 2020].|
|||UNICEF, “Social service workforce safety and wellbeing during the COVID-19 response: Recommended actions,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef.org/media/68501/file/Social-Service-Workforce-Safety-and-Wellbeing-during-COVID19-Response.pdf. [Accessed 1 August 2020].|